GLM 4.5V vs GLM 4.5

GLM 4.5V and GLM 4.5 charge the same $0.60 per 1M for input. The whole difference is on the output side, where GLM 4.5V asks $1.80 against $2.20, 18% less. A single chat turn costs a fraction of a cent on both, so this only becomes real money at volume: a thousand agent loops costs $115.20 against $120.80.

What the extra 11% buys is 5.2 points of overall intelligence (Intelligence Index): 12.8 (Reasoning) against 7.6 (Reasoning). GLM 4.5V is the one to pick unless you need GLM 4.5's lead on overall intelligence.

Standard pay-as-you-go prices, as of 11 Aug 2025. Last updated 15 Oct 2026.

Never miss an AI pricing or launch update

Get notified about new model launches, pricing changes, provider updates, deprecations, and cost-saving insights.

๐Ÿ”’ We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.

Cheaper overall

GLM 4.5V

10% lower blended rate

Higher benchmark scores

GLM 4.5

leads on 9 of 9 figures

Bigger context window

GLM 4.5

128,000 vs 65,536 tokens

Where each one wins

GLM 4.5V

  • Cheaper output tokens $1.80 vs $2.20, 18% less
  • Cheaper on all four workloads

GLM 4.5

  • Larger context window 128,000 tokens
  • Longer maximum output 98,304 tokens
  • Higher overall intelligence (Intelligence Index) 12.8 vs 7.6
  • Higher graduate-level science (GPQA Diamond) 78.2 vs 68.4
  • Higher expert-exam performance (Humanity's Last Exam) 13 vs 6.3
  • Ahead on 6 more benchmark figures

What four workloads cost

One run, and the same run a thousand times.

GLM 4.5V is cheaper on all four workloads, by much the same margin each time โ€” about 1.1 times, from $0.0015 against $0.0017 on a chat turn to $0.1152 against $0.1208 on a long document.

Workload GLM 4.5V GLM 4.5 ร—1,000 Difference
Chat turn 1,000 in / 500 out $0.0015 $0.0017 $1.50 / $1.70 GLM 4.5V is 12% cheaper
RAG answer 10,000 in / 800 out $0.0074 $0.0078 $7.44 / $7.76 GLM 4.5V is 4% cheaper
Agent loop 32,000 in / 700 out ร— 20 calls $0.1152 $0.1208 $115.20 / $120.80 GLM 4.5V is 5% cheaper
Long document 400,000 in / 3,000 out GLM 4.5V's context window holds 65,536 tokens, so a 400,000-token prompt does not fit.

Price your own token counts for these two โ†’

Price per 1M tokens

Neither model changes its rate with prompt length, so these rates apply to every request.

Context band Price GLM 4.5V GLM 4.5 Difference
Any prompt length Input $0.60 $0.60 Same
Any prompt length Cached input $0.11 $0.11 Same
Any prompt length Output $1.80 $2.20 GLM 4.5V is 18% cheaper

Blended: GLM 4.5V $0.90, GLM 4.5 $1.00 per 1M โ€” one rate at 3:1 input to output, for comparing two models at a glance.

Both priced by Z.ai. Standard tier, pay-as-you-go.

Benchmarks

GLM 4.5 leads on all 10 figures, furthest ahead on long-context reasoning (AA-LCR), by 52.7 points.

Overall intelligence

Intelligence Index โ€” Overall intelligence across reasoning, knowledge & math evals

GLM 4.5V 7.6
GLM 4.5 12.8

GLM 4.5 ahead by 5.2

Graduate-level science

GPQA Diamond โ€” Graduate-level questions in biology, chemistry & physics

GLM 4.5V 68.4
GLM 4.5 78.2

GLM 4.5 ahead by 9.8

Expert-exam performance

Humanity's Last Exam โ€” Expert-level questions across many academic domains

GLM 4.5V 6.3
GLM 4.5 13

GLM 4.5 ahead by 6.7

Instruction following

IFBench โ€” Precise following of detailed instructions

GLM 4.5V 34.2
GLM 4.5 44.1

GLM 4.5 ahead by 9.9

Support-agent performance

ฯ„ยฒ-Bench Telecom โ€” Tool-using agent tasks in a telecom support setting

GLM 4.5V 22.5
GLM 4.5 43

GLM 4.5 ahead by 20.5

Long-context reasoning

AA-LCR โ€” Long-context reasoning across large inputs

GLM 4.5V 0
GLM 4.5 52.7

GLM 4.5 ahead by 52.7

Command-line work

Terminal-Bench Hard โ€” Complex command-line and terminal workflows

GLM 4.5V 6.8
GLM 4.5 22

GLM 4.5 ahead by 15.2

Physics research reasoning

CritPt โ€” Unpublished physics research reasoning problems

GLM 4.5V 0
GLM 4.5 0

Level

Factual accuracy

Omniscience Accuracy โ€” Breadth of factual knowledge across domains

GLM 4.5V 20.8
GLM 4.5 25.1

GLM 4.5 ahead by 4.3

Answer reliability

Omniscience Non-Hallucination โ€” How reliably the model avoids fabricated answers

GLM 4.5V 15.2
GLM 4.5 29.9

GLM 4.5 ahead by 14.7

Each figure is that model's best published run, with the effort level named beside it โ€” where these scores come from.

Specifications

GLM 4.5 holds 62,464 more input tokens in one request. GLM 4.5V also takes image and video. Only GLM 4.5 lists prompt caching.

Specification GLM 4.5V GLM 4.5
Context window 65,536 tokens 128,000 tokens
Max output 16,384 tokens 98,304 tokens
Takes in Text, image, video Text
Puts out Text Text
Knowledge cutoff 31 Dec 2024 31 Dec 2024
Released 11 Aug 2025 26 Jul 2025
Status Active Active
Sold by Z.ai Z.ai
Tool use Yes Yes
Structured outputs Not listed Not listed
Web search Not listed Not listed
Prompt caching Not listed Yes
Code execution Not listed Not listed
Computer use Not listed Not listed
Open weights Yes Yes
Reasoning Yes Yes

FAQs

Is GLM 4.5V cheaper than GLM 4.5?
Yes. A 1,000-token prompt with a 500-token reply costs $0.0015 on GLM 4.5V and $0.0017 on GLM 4.5, and the same model is cheaper on every workload on this page.
How much do GLM 4.5V and GLM 4.5 cost per 1M tokens?
GLM 4.5V costs $0.60 for input and $1.80 for output. GLM 4.5 costs $0.60 and $2.20. Standard pay-as-you-go rates, as of 11 Aug 2025.
Which is better, GLM 4.5V or GLM 4.5?
On published benchmarks, GLM 4.5. It leads on 9 of the 10 figures both models report, including overall intelligence (Intelligence Index), where it scores 12.8 against 7.6.
Does GLM 4.5V or GLM 4.5 have a bigger context window?
GLM 4.5, at 128,000 tokens against 65,536. That is 62,464 more input tokens in a single request.

Explore these models

GLM 4.5V

Z.ai ยท 65,536-token context

Pricing · Calculator · Specifications

GLM 4.5

Z.ai ยท 128,000-token context

Pricing · Calculator · Specifications

Other comparisons