GLM-5.3 vs gpt-5.6-sol

GLM-5.3 is the cheaper of the two, though not evenly: its output costs 78% less than gpt-5.6-sol's, $4.40 per 1M against $20.00, while its input is only 65% cheaper, $1.40 against $4.00. Caching narrows the gap: over a thousand agent loops, where most of each prompt comes from cache, that is $273.60 against $680.00.

gpt-5.6-sol costs 3.7 times as much as GLM-5.3, and what that buys is 2.2 points of overall intelligence (Intelligence Index): 47 (max) against 44.8 (max), a gap small enough that price is the more useful guide. On that evidence GLM-5.3 is the safer default.

Standard pay-as-you-go prices, as of 23 Aug 2026. Last updated 22 Sep 2026.

Never miss an AI pricing or launch update

Get notified about new model launches, pricing changes, provider updates, deprecations, and cost-saving insights.

๐Ÿ”’ We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.

Cheaper overall

GLM-5.3

73% lower blended rate

Higher benchmark scores

gpt-5.6-sol

leads on 7 of 11 figures

Bigger context window

gpt-5.6-sol

1,050,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens

Cheaper cached input

GLM-5.3

$0.26 vs $0.40, 35% less

Where each one wins

GLM-5.3

  • Cheaper input tokens $1.40 vs $4.00, 65% less
  • Cheaper output tokens $4.40 vs $20.00, 78% less
  • Cheaper cached input $0.26 vs $0.40, 35% less
  • Cheaper on all four workloads
  • Higher multi-step tool use (Agentic Index) 53.1 vs 50.2
  • Higher scientific coding (SciCode) 59 vs 57.8
  • Higher real-world task performance (GDPval) 57.3 vs 54.4
  • Ahead on 1 more benchmark figure

gpt-5.6-sol

  • Larger context window 1,050,000 tokens
  • Higher overall intelligence (Intelligence Index) 47 vs 44.8
  • Higher coding ability (Coding Index) 78.3 vs 74.8
  • Higher graduate-level science (GPQA Diamond) 94.1 vs 91.7
  • Ahead on 4 more benchmark figures
  • Offers Batch, Flex and Priority pricing not listed for GLM-5.3

What four workloads cost

One run, and the same run a thousand times.

The gap opens on long prompts: GLM-5.3 costs $0.5732 against $3.29, a difference of $2,716.80 over a thousand runs.

Workload GLM-5.3 gpt-5.6-sol ร—1,000 Difference
Chat turn 1,000 in / 500 out $0.0036 $0.0140 $3.60 / $14.00 GLM-5.3 is 74% cheaper
RAG answer 10,000 in / 800 out $0.0175 $0.0560 $17.52 / $56.00 GLM-5.3 is 69% cheaper
Agent loop 32,000 in / 700 out ร— 20 calls $0.2736 $0.6800 $273.60 / $680.00 GLM-5.3 is 60% cheaper
Long document 400,000 in / 3,000 out $0.5732 $3.29 $573.20 / $3,290.00 GLM-5.3 is 83% cheaper

Price your own token counts for these two โ†’

Price per 1M tokens

Above 272,000 input tokens the rates change, and the new rate applies to the whole request, not just the tokens past that point: gpt-5.6-sol's input goes from $4.00 to $8.00. It does not change which of the two is cheaper.

Context band Price GLM-5.3 gpt-5.6-sol Difference
Prompts up to 272,000 tokens Input $1.40 $4.00 GLM-5.3 is 65% cheaper
Prompts up to 272,000 tokens Cached input $0.26 $0.40 GLM-5.3 is 35% cheaper
Prompts up to 272,000 tokens Output $4.40 $20.00 GLM-5.3 is 78% cheaper
Prompts over 272,000 tokens Input $1.40 $8.00 GLM-5.3 is 83% cheaper
Prompts over 272,000 tokens Cached input $0.26 $0.80 GLM-5.3 is 68% cheaper
Prompts over 272,000 tokens Output $4.40 $30.00 GLM-5.3 is 85% cheaper

Blended: GLM-5.3 $2.15, gpt-5.6-sol $8.00 per 1M โ€” one rate at 3:1 input to output, for comparing two models at a glance.

GLM-5.3 priced by Z.ai, gpt-5.6-sol by OpenAI. Standard tier, pay-as-you-go.

Other pricing tiers

Only gpt-5.6-sol lists Batch, Flex and Priority, at up to 50% off its own standard rate; GLM-5.3 offers none of them.

Every tier either model sells is here, so this is the whole price sheet. A saving is measured against that model's own standard rate โ€” how we read tiers.

Tier GLM-5.3 gpt-5.6-sol Cheaper
Batch only on gpt-5.6-sol Not offered $2.00 in / $10.00 out 50% off Standard
Flex only on gpt-5.6-sol Not offered $2.00 in / $10.00 out 50% off Standard
Priority only on gpt-5.6-sol Not offered $8.00 in / $40.00 out

Benchmarks

They share 11 figures: GLM-5.3 leads on 4, gpt-5.6-sol on 7. The widest gap is 59.8 points, on answer reliability (Omniscience Non-Hallucination).

Overall intelligence

Intelligence Index โ€” Overall intelligence across reasoning, knowledge & math evals

GLM-5.3 44.8
gpt-5.6-sol 47

gpt-5.6-sol ahead by 2.2

Coding ability

Coding Index โ€” Coding ability across software-engineering evals

GLM-5.3 74.8
gpt-5.6-sol 78.3

gpt-5.6-sol ahead by 3.5

Multi-step tool use

Agentic Index โ€” Tool use & multi-step agent task performance

GLM-5.3 53.1
gpt-5.6-sol 50.2

GLM-5.3 ahead by 2.9

Graduate-level science

GPQA Diamond โ€” Graduate-level questions in biology, chemistry & physics

GLM-5.3 91.7
gpt-5.6-sol 94.1

gpt-5.6-sol ahead by 2.4

Expert-exam performance

Humanity's Last Exam โ€” Expert-level questions across many academic domains

GLM-5.3 42.3
gpt-5.6-sol 49.5

gpt-5.6-sol ahead by 7.2

Long-context reasoning

AA-LCR โ€” Long-context reasoning across large inputs

GLM-5.3 79.7
gpt-5.6-sol 84

gpt-5.6-sol ahead by 4.3

Scientific coding

SciCode โ€” Research-level scientific coding tasks

GLM-5.3 59
gpt-5.6-sol 57.8

GLM-5.3 ahead by 1.2

Physics research reasoning

CritPt โ€” Unpublished physics research reasoning problems

GLM-5.3 19.1
gpt-5.6-sol 32.3

gpt-5.6-sol ahead by 13.2

Real-world task performance

GDPval โ€” Economically valuable, real-world knowledge work

GLM-5.3 57.3
gpt-5.6-sol 54.4

GLM-5.3 ahead by 2.9

Factual accuracy

Omniscience Accuracy โ€” Breadth of factual knowledge across domains

GLM-5.3 33.9
gpt-5.6-sol 59.4

gpt-5.6-sol ahead by 25.5

Answer reliability

Omniscience Non-Hallucination โ€” How reliably the model avoids fabricated answers

GLM-5.3 70.4
gpt-5.6-sol 10.6

GLM-5.3 ahead by 59.8

Each figure is that model's best published run, with the effort level named beside it โ€” where these scores come from.

Specifications

gpt-5.6-sol holds 50,000 more input tokens in one request. gpt-5.6-sol also takes file and image. Only GLM-5.3 lists open weights.

Specification GLM-5.3 gpt-5.6-sol
Context window 1,000,000 tokens 1,050,000 tokens
Max output 128,000 tokens 128,000 tokens
Takes in Text Text, image, file
Puts out Text Text
Knowledge cutoff โ€” 16 Feb 2026
Released 14 Aug 2026 9 Jul 2026
Status Active Active
Sold by Perplexity, Z.ai OpenAI, Perplexity
Tool use Yes Yes
Structured outputs Yes Yes
Web search Not listed Not listed
Prompt caching Yes Yes
Code execution Yes Yes
Computer use Not listed Not listed
Open weights Yes Not listed
Reasoning Yes Yes

FAQs

Is GLM-5.3 cheaper than gpt-5.6-sol?
Yes. A 1,000-token prompt with a 500-token reply costs $0.0036 on GLM-5.3 and $0.0140 on gpt-5.6-sol, and the same model is cheaper on every workload on this page.
How much do GLM-5.3 and gpt-5.6-sol cost per 1M tokens?
GLM-5.3 costs $1.40 for input and $4.40 for output. gpt-5.6-sol costs $4.00 and $20.00. Standard pay-as-you-go rates, as of 23 Aug 2026.
Which is better, GLM-5.3 or gpt-5.6-sol?
On published benchmarks, gpt-5.6-sol. It leads on 7 of the 11 figures both models report, including overall intelligence (Intelligence Index), where it scores 47 against 44.8.
Does GLM-5.3 or gpt-5.6-sol offer batch pricing?
gpt-5.6-sol only. Its batch input costs $2.00, 50% off its standard rate, and GLM-5.3 lists no batch tier at all.
Does GLM-5.3 or gpt-5.6-sol have a bigger context window?
gpt-5.6-sol, at 1,050,000 tokens against 1,000,000. That is 50,000 more input tokens in a single request.

Explore these models

GLM-5.3

Z.ai ยท 1,000,000-token context

Pricing · Calculator · Specifications

gpt-5.6-sol

OpenAI ยท 1,050,000-token context

Pricing · Calculator · Specifications

Other comparisons