Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 are not really in the same price bracket. Claude Haiku 5.5 charges $0.10 per 1M for input and $0.50 for output; Claude Opus 5.5 asks $4.00 and $20.00, 40 times as much. Run a thousand times, a long document costs $207.50 on Claude Haiku 5.5 against $1,660.00 on Claude Opus 5.5.

What the premium buys is 14.2 points of overall intelligence (Intelligence Index): 57.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, D) against 43.4 (Max). Unless you genuinely need that lead, take Claude Haiku 5.5 โ€” the premium here is steep.

Standard pay-as-you-go prices, as of 7 Oct 2026. Last updated 15 Oct 2026.

Never miss an AI pricing or launch update

Get notified about new model launches, pricing changes, provider updates, deprecations, and cost-saving insights.

๐Ÿ”’ We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.

Cheaper overall

Claude Haiku 5.5

98% lower blended rate

Higher benchmark scores

Claude Opus 5.5

leads on 13 of 14 figures

Cheaper cached input

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.01 vs $0.20, 95% less

Where each one wins

Claude Haiku 5.5

  • Cheaper input tokens $0.10 vs $4.00, 98% less
  • Cheaper output tokens $0.50 vs $20.00, 98% less
  • Cheaper cached input $0.01 vs $0.20, 95% less
  • Cheaper on all four workloads
  • Higher answer reliability (Omniscience Non-Hallucination) 59.6 vs 41.4

Claude Opus 5.5

  • Higher overall intelligence (Intelligence Index) 57.6 vs 43.4
  • Higher expert-exam performance (Humanity's Last Exam) 61.4 vs 44.4
  • Higher long-context reasoning (AA-LCR) 84.7 vs 82.7
  • Ahead on 10 more benchmark figures

What four workloads cost

One run, and the same run a thousand times.

The gap opens on long prompts: Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.2075 against $1.66, a difference of $1,452.50 over a thousand runs.

Workload Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Opus 5.5 ร—1,000 Difference
Chat turn 1,000 in / 500 out $0.0004 $0.0140 $0.3500 / $14.00 Claude Haiku 5.5 is 98% cheaper
RAG answer 10,000 in / 800 out $0.0014 $0.0560 $1.40 / $56.00 Claude Haiku 5.5 is 98% cheaper
Agent loop 32,000 in / 700 out ร— 20 calls $0.0170 $0.5600 $17.00 / $560.00 Claude Haiku 5.5 is 97% cheaper
Long document 400,000 in / 3,000 out $0.2075 $1.66 $207.50 / $1,660.00 Claude Haiku 5.5 is 88% cheaper

Price your own token counts for these two โ†’

Price per 1M tokens

Above 100,000 input tokens the rates change, and the new rate applies to the whole request, not just the tokens past that point: Claude Haiku 5.5's input goes from $0.1000 to $0.5000. It does not change which of the two is cheaper.

Context band Price Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Opus 5.5 Difference
Prompts up to 100,000 tokens Input $0.10 $4.00 Claude Haiku 5.5 is 98% cheaper
Prompts up to 100,000 tokens Cached input $0.01 $0.20 Claude Haiku 5.5 is 95% cheaper
Prompts up to 100,000 tokens Output $0.50 $20.00 Claude Haiku 5.5 is 98% cheaper
Prompts over 100,000 tokens Input $0.50 $4.00 Claude Haiku 5.5 is 88% cheaper
Prompts over 100,000 tokens Cached input $0.05 $0.20 Claude Haiku 5.5 is 75% cheaper
Prompts over 100,000 tokens Output $2.50 $20.00 Claude Haiku 5.5 is 88% cheaper

Blended: Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.20, Claude Opus 5.5 $8.00 per 1M โ€” one rate at 3:1 input to output, for comparing two models at a glance.

Both priced by Anthropic. Standard tier, pay-as-you-go.

Other pricing tiers

Both models offer Batch, worth up to 50% off their standard rates, and the cheaper model is the same one on every tier โ€” so the tier you buy changes the bill rather than the choice.

Every tier either model sells is here, so this is the whole price sheet. A saving is measured against that model's own standard rate โ€” how we read tiers.

Tier Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Opus 5.5 Cheaper
Batch $0.05 in / $0.25 out 50% off Standard $2.00 in / $10.00 out 50% off Standard Claude Haiku 5.5

Benchmarks

They share 14 figures: Claude Haiku 5.5 leads on 1, Claude Opus 5.5 on 13. The widest gap is 151 points, on Gamedev Elo.

Overall intelligence

Intelligence Index โ€” Overall intelligence across reasoning, knowledge & math evals

Claude Haiku 5.5 43.4
Claude Opus 5.5 57.6

Claude Opus 5.5 ahead by 14.2

Expert-exam performance

Humanity's Last Exam โ€” Expert-level questions across many academic domains

Claude Haiku 5.5 44.4
Claude Opus 5.5 61.4

Claude Opus 5.5 ahead by 17

Long-context reasoning

AA-LCR โ€” Long-context reasoning across large inputs

Claude Haiku 5.5 82.7
Claude Opus 5.5 84.7

Claude Opus 5.5 ahead by 2

Scientific coding

SciCode โ€” Research-level scientific coding tasks

Claude Haiku 5.5 55
Claude Opus 5.5 66.9

Claude Opus 5.5 ahead by 11.9

Physics research reasoning

CritPt โ€” Unpublished physics research reasoning problems

Claude Haiku 5.5 18.9
Claude Opus 5.5 31.7

Claude Opus 5.5 ahead by 12.8

Real-world task performance

GDPval โ€” Economically valuable, real-world knowledge work

Claude Haiku 5.5 56
Claude Opus 5.5 68.3

Claude Opus 5.5 ahead by 12.3

Factual accuracy

Omniscience Accuracy โ€” Breadth of factual knowledge across domains

Claude Haiku 5.5 36.4
Claude Opus 5.5 66.2

Claude Opus 5.5 ahead by 29.8

Answer reliability

Omniscience Non-Hallucination โ€” How reliably the model avoids fabricated answers

Claude Haiku 5.5 59.6
Claude Opus 5.5 41.4

Claude Haiku 5.5 ahead by 18.2

3d Elo

Design Arena head-to-head rating in the 3d category

Claude Haiku 5.5 1,355
Claude Opus 5.5 1,479

Claude Opus 5.5 ahead by 124

Codecategories Elo

Design Arena head-to-head rating in the codecategories category

Claude Haiku 5.5 1,280
Claude Opus 5.5 1,393

Claude Opus 5.5 ahead by 113

Dataviz Elo

Design Arena head-to-head rating in the dataviz category

Claude Haiku 5.5 1,292
Claude Opus 5.5 1,398

Claude Opus 5.5 ahead by 106

Gamedev Elo

Design Arena head-to-head rating in the gamedev category

Claude Haiku 5.5 1,310
Claude Opus 5.5 1,461

Claude Opus 5.5 ahead by 151

Uicomponent Elo

Design Arena head-to-head rating in the uicomponent category

Claude Haiku 5.5 1,308
Claude Opus 5.5 1,384

Claude Opus 5.5 ahead by 76

Website Elo

Design Arena head-to-head rating in the website category

Claude Haiku 5.5 1,267
Claude Opus 5.5 1,335

Claude Opus 5.5 ahead by 68

Each figure is that model's best published run, with the effort level named beside it โ€” where these scores come from.

Specifications

Both list the same capabilities, so nothing here separates them.

Specification Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Opus 5.5
Context window 1,000,000 tokens 1,000,000 tokens
Max output 128,000 tokens 128,000 tokens
Takes in Text, image, file Text, image, file
Puts out Text Text
Knowledge cutoff 30 Jun 2026 30 Jun 2026
Released 7 Oct 2026 22 Sep 2026
Status Active Active
Sold by Anthropic, Perplexity Anthropic, Perplexity
Tool use Yes Yes
Structured outputs Yes Yes
Web search Not listed Not listed
Prompt caching Yes Yes
Code execution Yes Yes
Computer use Yes Yes
Open weights Not listed Not listed
Reasoning Yes Yes

FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5?
Yes. A 1,000-token prompt with a 500-token reply costs $0.0004 on Claude Haiku 5.5 and $0.0140 on Claude Opus 5.5, and the same model is cheaper on every workload on this page.
How much do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 cost per 1M tokens?
Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 for input and $0.50 for output. Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00 and $20.00. Standard pay-as-you-go rates, as of 7 Oct 2026.
Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Claude Opus 5.5?
On published benchmarks, Claude Opus 5.5. It leads on 13 of the 14 figures both models report, including overall intelligence (Intelligence Index), where it scores 57.6 against 43.4.
Is Batch pricing cheaper for Claude Haiku 5.5 or Claude Opus 5.5?
Batch input costs $0.05 on Claude Haiku 5.5 and $2.00 on Claude Opus 5.5, 50% below the standard rate on both.

Explore these models

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic ยท 1,000,000-token context

Pricing · Calculator · Specifications

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic ยท 1,000,000-token context

Pricing · Calculator · Specifications

Other comparisons